Had2 wrote:
According to ryld. Who was NOT there. Maybe ryld believes no one asked the Apopstles to describe what Jesus looked like. Maybe ryld believes no one knew how to draw in the time of the Apostles. Maybe ryld believes every christian in the first century knew how to read.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh he makes no sense at all. I suppose he also knows what Jesus wrote in the sand.

I don't know if anyone asked what Jesus looked like as a man, but one thing I know, the Apostles were preaching Jesus as the I AM who offered that flesh for the sacrifice for sin, having remitted all of sin.  Therefore, it mattered not a fig what Jesus human flesh looked like. 

People have known how to draw ever since they ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.  Many in the time of Christ knew how to read, Had.  They were not like the dumbed down masses of the "Holy" Roman Empire, whose emperors were appointed by the Antichrist False Prophet of Rome.  Seeing a picture at any rate, is not hearing the Gospel.  The Apostles went about preaching, not drawing pictures.  Even if the crowds could not read, they could certainly listen.  Most weren't deaf and the Apostles had no need to draw pictures.  It's funny how you think illiteracy requires pretty pictures instead of just the speaking of the Word of the Gospel. 

Yes, Jesus wrote in the sand showing that those Pharisees who were judging others of what they themselves were guilty would also be judged: 

13O LORD, the hope of Israel, all that forsake thee shall be ashamed, and they that depart from me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the LORD, the fountain of living waters.  Jer. 17

Last Edited By: ryld Jun 24 11 3:16 PM. Edited 1 times.