ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 17181
Member Since: 12/03/06
Aug 14 13 6:01 AM
George Coyne, former Director of the Vatican Observatory, head of the observatory's research group and Jesuit Priest disagrees. In his paper: The Church's Most Recent Attempt to Dispel the Galileo Myth (which I recommend reading) he gives quite a thorough synopsis of events and reasons surrounding the Galileo affair. It is well written and thoroughly footnoted.
To a Christian in whom Christ is being formed in all the days of their lives, by the living word of God that reforms them, as those who walks or reasons by and exclusive faith according to the eye witness account of someone who was there in the beginning, creating substance out of nothing. And has given us a written account or a codex (book of the law) by which He can and does draw us to follow Him in other area of life also, as a living will. Whether they claim to be Christian or atheist that discards that exclusive faith according to another kind law which comes from reasoning after empiricism, there exclusive witness as no faith, by which they develop their conclusions which is to reason by sight, after things seen, through “I heard it through the grape vine” oral traditions of men. In the end of the matter it just shows they are not following after Christ, as the things of God, but are walking after the manner of the spirit of this world, after natural man.
In the end of mater its either we have been become a new creature through, and according to the law of God’s faith, as He works to give us that faith that comes by hearing Him, or we reason amongst ourselves as those of no faith.
Doubt is not the opposite of a codified faith, unbelief is .
Share This