If God is not a respecter of persons and Peter does not rise above the term "every man", why would we trust his unknown opinion, which can only come from rightly dividing, Christ's words of truth, as the fruit of Peter's labor, which some call infallible?

premise 1: God is not a respector of person.
premise 2: Peter does not rise above the term "Every man".
conclusion: Therefore, Peter cannot be infallible.

I agree with that; but our claim is not that Peter is infallible, only that statements made ex cathedra are infallible.

But, if you want to bear witness in that regards to, then keep grieving God, though Iwish for you rsake, you wouldn't.

Jim

Catholicism = Jesus Christ + NOTHING
Non-Catholic Christianity = Jesus Christ - LOTS