Did St. Paul have the faith of Christ in respect to a private revelation?????


No, the Labor of Christ's love was not in respect to a private revelation as one loosed from earth, which can only provide an private interpretation,
which come with a strong delusion making it possible to believe the lie that God is not silent and that His will is not sealed up until the end of time, when every eye will see Him and say Lo is Christ, He has come again just as He promised.

And....if all we needed was the Word and NO man to teach us, then for what reason would Jesus have sent out a man, Paul, to OPEN THEIR EYES?

Since only God can create in us a new heart as the eyes of our heart, and Paul of himself could not even open his own eyes, explain how a mere man could open the eyes of another. Does the faith to believe God come from Paul in any manner, can we attribute to Paul what the Lord does to him, or is it a work of God alone that we can believe God and that work of faith is not after any creature ,neither after Paul or after Balaam's' donkey,or a handkerchief, hank of bone that has no spirit life to give.?

That criterion has not changed, we are not to have the faith of Christ as the work of the Spirit of Christ in respect to any person or after any rudiment of this world.

Paul has no authority to open the eyes of a heart, as one circumcised by faith, If he could not open is own eyes, surely the idea of him having the authority to open the eyes of the heart

Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: